Need A Favor - Real Amateur Porn
August 15, 2008 – 6:15 pmAnyone who has read this blog for any length of time knows I’m pretty darn new at this. I’ve definitely increased the quality of my vids from day one. No doubt about that. But now, I really want to offer the sharpest product I can. I’ve been doing some research on video technology and basically it comes down to trial and error for each system.
Sooooooo, I was hoping you guys could help me out. The links below are the same video scene, just different compression…..I’ll spare you the details…..they’re not interesting. :-) I look at video all day long so it’s hard for me to tell the difference in my own stuff. Please watch them both and then tell me if either A or B looks any better than the other or if there’s really no difference. Added bonus…..the video is of Keisha so even if you didn’t buy her video, you can have a chance to see her beauty in action. :-) Let me know guys. A or B or no discernable difference.
Thanks.
Steve
Update 08/18/2008: It appears there is little to no difference in the qulaity of either so I guess I’ll stick with A. Everyone seems to think A is good and A is what you get in my scenes now so A is what I’ll stick with for the time being as I try to find some compression software to allow me to get youa higher bit rate with a reasonable file size.
8 Responses to “Need A Favor - Real Amateur Porn”
I played them side-by-side and A has the better picture in my opinion.
By Chris on Aug 15, 2008
They look about the same to me, but then again Keisha looks good sucking dick in any video format. A did download and play a lot faster.
By Bryan on Aug 15, 2008
A gave a greater picture and color quality on my screen then did B. I didn’t notice any difference in the download times, but that for me is something I don’t care about. I want quality in the actual movie, and A takes the cake.
By Chris on Aug 16, 2008
A looks better, but any any girl swallowing looks good!
By A on Aug 16, 2008
couldn’t tell a difference myself
By jack on Aug 16, 2008
WMP v10, screen size 1280 x 1024, view = 200%
Difference was barely apparent. For the 50% reduction in size, I’d say stay with the compression on Ver A of the clip.
What program are you using? What codec? (Just professional curiosity.)
By Scott G. on Aug 18, 2008
When viewing in a smaller screen they were too close to call–in full screen B won out for me. I am using an LCD TV as a monitor so I am not sure if that made a difference or not. In my opinion I would say whichever is easier/more cost effective for you is the way to go as the diference was not huge.
By Jared on Aug 18, 2008
Sony Vegas Pro 8.0. WMV 720×480 x 1.5Mbps. That was what A was and that’s what all my videos are. B was double the bit rate which doubled the size with no noticeable improvement in quality per the comments I rec’d.
I know I can get the quality better. It’s just a matter of playing around with it. My raw avi files are amazing but come out to about 220MB/minute. That would be one helluva download. About 6.6 GB for one of my 30 min vids.
I don’t know who you are but if you have any experience with compression software, let me know. I know that’s what I need to really get the vids to pop. I just haven’t found one I like yet.
By admin on Aug 18, 2008